This site has historically kept track of all Covid-19 vaccine VAERS records which were erased from the system (or hidden from public view) in subsequent weeks. So records appear one week in the weekly release, and then sometimes they are gone in the next release or subsequent releases. All of the VAERS records which have gone missing since January are documented here in this post: Are VAERS records for Covid-19 Vaccines being deleted every week???.
Something very interesting happened this past week over the Thanksgiving holidays. The regular Friday weekly VAERS data release (11/26) did not happen, presumably because of the holiday. Instead, the release happened on Monday, 11/29. However, what was unusual was that initially at the time of release, the download files contained an extra 14,529 records which were not supposed to be there. These files were quickly replaced with the correct ones, but not before Albert Benavides (aka WelcomeTheEagle88 — the CDC can’t get anything past Mr. Eagle Eyes!), was able to download the files first. Anyone else who subsequently downloaded the data release files, ended up downloading files which didn’t contain the extra 14,529 records. These extra records which Albert received were obviously slotted to be released the subsequent week (for the 12/3 release).
So what would happen during this Friday’s (12/3) weekly data release? Would we see these 14,529 records in the data release? Would there be any missing? What actually ended up happening?
Well, all of the 14,529 extra records from 11/29 did in fact show up in the Friday 12/3 data release…EXCEPT for this one below, a 2 year-old from Alaska who died on the same day as he received the Covid injection:

This here folks, is proof that the CDC does in fact withhold records from public viewing. This record was clearly included in the 14,529 records that someone (the holiday crew perhaps?) mistakenly published alongside the regular records on 11/29 (though the extra records were quickly removed).
Will this record show up in a future release? Perhaps. But what should concern us all is the following:
(1) Why were there records being withheld if they were already available to be made public? If this is indeed the most “Intense Safety Monitoring in US History“, then why wait to make any relevant data public? Are they throttling the data by design? The excuse that perhaps these records were being held up because the CDC still needed to make changes to the records does not hold up to scrutiny, since the 14,529 records (minus 1) which were mistakenly included on 11/29 were identical to the records which showed up on 12/3.
(2) Why did they choose to withhold the record for the 2 year old, such that no one would even know it had ever existed if they hadn’t accidentally “published” it temporarily on 11/29?
(3) Why is anyone even injecting 2 year olds (injection date was very recent on 11/18/21)? These products have not been authorized for 2 year olds…
(4) What is it with them needing to remove VAERS records of 2 year olds? This is not their first rodeo…see here: Missing Persons Report: 2 year old who passed away after receiving the jab disappeared from VAERS (not just once, but twice…)
Anyone have good answers to these questions???
Lastly, in case you do not believe there actually were such files containing the 14,529 extra records, they were posted on this site here prior to 12/3. You can check the Wayback Machine at https://archive.org to see when the files were uploaded to this site:
Also, the files were posted directly to https://archive.org prior to 12/3 as well: https://archive.org/details/eagles-extra-data-112921-2021-vaersdata
This is of course so horrible, and I’m grateful for your time and efforts. I’m thinking the 2 year old must be part of their clinical trials for the under 5 crowd right? How awful and evil.
Hypothetically, what if that particular 2-yr old entry was fictional, reported by someone trying to either sensationalize, discredit VAERS, or just test to see if a fictional entry is possible? In that case, detecting and omitting the false entry would actually, add to VAERS’ credibility. No? Again, hypothetical question.
Possible. but IMO, unlikely. A previous attempt to create a fake record several years ago (“Incredible Hulk” record) was actually published, then later removed.
Is it possible to do a FOIA request for files related to this particular entry?
FOIA request is in process…
Thank you Wayne! Yes, the pro-vaxxers seem to be zeroing in on this one 2yr old and maybe it wasn’t a legitimate report? Deleting records after publication is nothing new as we both now. The fine print in VAERS says they delete duplicates and fraudulent claims. Ok very fair and appropriate. However, why can’t we find the “twin” record of all those deleted? I can only find a “twin” of maybe 10%-15% of all the deleted that I spot checked. I actually checked all the 1st couple hundred in the first few months but the deletion frequency became to great. I did check this 2yr old and there is no other 2yr that died in Alaska!! So there you go, maybe can say they will eventually report this death. That takes us to point #2) filing a false claim in a felony and it says that on every single page/screen to remind you of that fact if you ever had the unfortunate opportunity to file one (I have).
So the real story here is all the stuff between the lines that you described in the article, like why do they have to wait to report if this is a early warning system? Nothing was changed on the other ~15K records… nothing! Not a period, not a word, or phrase, nada!! the only thing “changed” from the 15K was the omission of this 2yr old. Well I will keep reminding and searching and alert the public if and when this 2yr old ever gets reported! Yes the Green Hulk report person should have gone to jail! Filing a false report is a felony… period.
Excellent comment, Mr. Eagle Eyes!!!
[…] SCRUBS Death Record of a 2-Year Old from Latest VAERS Release (12/3/21)*** vaersanalysis.info/2021/12/04/cdc… #CovidVaccine #COVIDVaccination #COVIDVaccineKids #COVIDVaccineMandate #vaccine #vaccines […]
This poor two year still M.I.A. as of data drop Dec 10th
that is correct, sir…
In Orwellian times, it is difficult to distinguish truth from information.
There is a previous case of a fabricated report of a two-year-old death:
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSL1N2MZ2FR
[…] website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on […]
[…] el lunes de Acción de Gracias en un lote de 14,529 registros que se descargaron, según un sitio web de análisis de VAERS dirigido por un rastreador de datos anónimo. Los informes retractados se volvieron a […]
[…] am Thanksgiving-Montag in einem Stapel von 14 529 Datensätzen, die heruntergeladen wurden, so eine VAERS-Analyse-Website, die von einem anonymen Datenverfolger betrieben wird. Die zurückgezogenen Berichte wurden dann am […]
[…] VAERS il lunedì del Ringraziamento in un batch di 14.529 record che sono stati scaricati, come uno Sito web di analisi VAERSgestito da un data tracker anonimo. Le segnalazioni ritirate sono state poi ricaricate sul sito il 3 […]
[…] website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on […]
[…] website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on […]
[…] website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on […]
[…] website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on […]
[…] VAERS Analysis discusses the scrubbed report: […]
[…] VAERS Analysis discusses the scrubbed report: […]
Thank you for your work
[…] *Source – VAERS Analysis* […]
[…] kurz auf der VAERS-Website in einem Stapel von 14.529 Datensätzen, die laut einer VAERS-Analyse-Website, die von einem anonymen Datentracker betrieben wird, heruntergeladen […]
[…] kurz auf der VAERS-Website in einem Stapel von 14.529 Datensätzen, die laut einer VAERS-Analyse-Website, die von einem anonymen Datentracker betrieben wird, heruntergeladen wurden . Die […]
[…] inaccurate. But, the facts don’t matter, only their narrative does. That’s why they erase records of vaccine injuries, including ones of two-year old children (why is a two-year old even getting jabbed in the first place?) […]
[…] explained in this previous post, back in December ’21, the death record of a 2 year old boy from Alaska who received the Pfizer […]
[…] ***Then there was report number 1887456, the report that vanished. […]