“In what kind of Bizarro upside-down clown world do we live in, if it is up to some random dude on the internet to show the VAERS safety analysis that our public health agencies have failed to do?” — WayneTheDBA

In Part I, we covered the early warning signs of DEATH showing up in VAERS shortly after the initial rollout of the Covid-19 jabs. Although DEATH is obviously a pretty horrible symptom to experience after receiving a vaccine, we should also take a look to see if any other symptoms may have been flashing warning signs early on. If we analyze the first few VAERS data releases following the experimental Covid-19 jab rollout, we find that indeed there were safety signals warning us fairly early about what was already happening and also perhaps foreshadowing what was to come, as we can now all see plainly with the benefit of hindsight.

Here are some examples of safety signals, in order of their first appearance in the initial few data releases from VAERS, starting from 12/18/20. Please remember that we are using the CDC’s definition of a safety signal (see here pg.16, valid safety signal is defined as PRR>=2 and ChiSq>=4, and at least 3 AEs), so these are valid signals that were triggered based on the CDC’s own methodology and data:

^{[For all the safety signal data, an excel file with all the data is attached at the bottom of this post.]}

You will notice that many heart-related events are included above…although myocarditis did not make it into VAERS this early on (remember that myocarditis has a greater incidence in younger males than the elderly population which was targeted at the time of initial rollout), what is interesting is the number of heart-related events that do in fact show up this early…it certainly seems as if these signals were already portending a flood of myo/pericarditis, heart attacks, and other heart/circulatory related events that were to come. Tachycardia, Chest discomfort, and Chest pain stand out as strong signals as early as 12/18/20, the first week of reporting post jab rollout. Notice also that safety signals for Tinnitus and Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) also make early entrances this very first week as well. More on these two specific symptoms at the end of this article.

Chistmas Eve of 2020 (12/24/20), resulted in VAERS gifting us with more heart-related safety signals, such as for Ventricular extrasystoles and Sinus tachycardia. In addition, Anaphylaxis made its first appearance this week. Then the following week, the first week of the new year in 2021 (1/7/21), gave another helping of heart-related signals, including many related to heart diagnostics (Fibrin D Dimer, Cardiovascular Evaluation, Electrocardiogram QT prolonged). Here’s a rhetorical question: if the shots have no adverse effect on the heart, why were all these tests being done? This week also introduced safety signals for Appendicitis (how come no one talks about this one???), for Dysstasia (difficulty standing), and for what was likely Bell’s Palsy (Facial paralysis and Dysarthria).

Safety signals for some very, very serious conditions were first introduced in the VAERS data drop on 1/15/21. Among them are: Immune Thrombocytopenia, Ischaemic stroke, Pulmonary embolism, Myocardial infarction, and Deep vein thrombosis. Also, do not miss the fact that safety signals for female reproductive issues started to surface this week as well: Metrorrhagia and Menorrhagia…perhaps the world didn’t get the memo from the CDC at the time, but the reality on the ground and in VAERS was a polar extreme opposite to public health’s “safe and effective” pronouncements for female reproductive health. What a Bizarro world we live in…

Safety signals for Haemorrhagic stroke, Cardiac arrest, Cerebral infarction, and Cerebral haemorrhage, all made noteworthy cameos in the VAERS data on 1/22/21. Also, given all the “died suddenly” news these days, one particular symptom that shows up this week really stands out, though should perhaps not be a surprise: Sudden death. Would it be fair to say that what’s old has become new again? Or do we always chalk up sudden death of the elderly to be of no consequence or concern? If you can remember the pre-Bizarro world, the elderly were treated with respect and honor…

The CDC’s SOP document (starting on pg.30) lists several Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI). These are the ones they were supposed to be doing “enhanced surveillance” (perhaps they were going to turn on their “extra duty super AESI monitoring” machine just for these). As you can conclude from the document, each of these AESI’s is essentially a category that encompasses one or more individual medDRA symptoms. Keep in mind that these events are what they were anticipating way back when they produced this document (1/29/21 is the date shown of the document). Here is their full list of AESIs:

• Acute Myocardial Infarction
• Anaphylaxis
• Appendicitis
• Bell’s Palsy
• Coagulopathy
• COVID-19 disease
• Death
• GBS
• Kawasaki’s disease
• Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C)
• Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A)
• Myopericarditis
• Narcolepsy/ Cataplexy
• Non-Death Serious
• Pregnancy and Prespecified
• Seizure/Convulsion
• Stroke
• Transverse myelitis

Then there is a second, shorter list of AESIs that are to be “monitored but not abstracted”. They include:

• Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
• Autoimmune disorders
• Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)
• Multiple sclerosis (MS)
• Optic neuritis (ON)
• Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)
• Encephalitis
• Myelitis
• Encephalomyelitis
• Meningoencephalitis
• Meningitis
• Encephalopathy
• Ataxia
• Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
• Vaccination errors

So the question is, were any of these AESI’s (in the main or secondary list) present in the early days post jab roll-out? The table below shows these AESI’s, with valid safety signals highlighted in yellow, from 12/18/20-1/22/21 (valid safety signal is defined as PRR>=2 and ChiSq>=4, and at least 3 AEs):

^{[All the data is available in the same excel file at the bottom of this post.]}

As you can see, the first AESI signals occurred on 12/24/20, for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Anaphylaxis, and Appendicitis (note that considering how low the raw counts were for these symptoms at the time, these could be considered not real strong signals). On 1/7/21, the signal for Covid-19 disease first appeared, while the signal for Acute Myocardial Infarction temporarily disappeared. On 1/15/21, the signal for Acute Myocardial Infarction returned, and a new signal for Stroke emerged. By 1/22/21, all five of these safety signals — Acute Myocardial Infarction, Anaphylaxis, Appendicitis, Covid-19 Disease, and Stroke — were solidly established. We’ll just go out on a limb and say you didn’t hear about any of these issues from the CDC (except maybe Anaphylaxis) within the first 6 months of rollout (if at all). [Edit: looks like they are finally admitting the shots cause strokes…only took about two years.]

Lastly, one cannot look at this data for any significant amount of time without reflecting on and grieving over the human suffering and the lives that have been tragically harmed or lost due to the experimental injections. With that in mind, we will conclude with a couple telling anecdotes (which are also somewhat personal):

Dyspnoea can be a debilitating condition. It can easily prevent someone from carrying out simple ordinary life tasks, such as lifting, moving, or carrying objects, even ones that are very modest in weight. Such a condition can make a flight of stairs turn into an arduous, “extreme sports” type of activity that can render someone wiped out for days. I am personally aware of an instance of just such a case, which resulted from a single mRNA shot well over a year and a half ago. This is an ongoing condition, but started out as a severe case of post-shot anaphylaxis.

Also, the experience of severe tinnitus after the Covid-19 jabs is a big deal. As was outlined over a year ago here, many sufferers of tinnitus actually end up victims of suicide due to the inability to cope with their agony. Unfortunately, tinnitus must be pretty common post-jab because there are many cases of household pairs (eg. husband and wife) coming down with tinnitus after receiving the shots. If the odds of developing a case pair are anywhere near 1 in 11 million (as claimed in the screenshot below), neither you nor I should know personally of even one such case…however, I am in fact, personally aware of one such case pair. Take a look below at the CDC’s open, transparent, and helpful response to someone’s inquiry regarding tinnitus case pairs…it is simply stunning:

There is no greater confirmation that the data in VAERS is authentic and a massive cause for alarm than what you unfortunately have seen with your own two eyes in your own circles of family, friends, acquaintances, etc. As a final note, though it may be stating something that should be obvious by now to anyone who has followed VAERS for any length of time: VAERS drastically underreports events that are happening out in the real world. You can multiply the raw counts of VAERS adverse events by 40x-60x and still be in the ballpark of reality. Of the dozen or so likely jab-related injuries that I’m personally aware of, I would wager that not a single one has been reported to VAERS.

Time to cut ties with Bizarro world…Defund the CDC.